Reports and Decisions of the Commissioner
Standing Committee of Ajauqtiit
Report on the Appointment of the
Conflict of Interest Commissioner of Nunavut
Third Session
First Legislative Assembly
Legislative Assembly of Nunavut
March 22, 2000
Hunter Tootoo, MLA Ovide Alakannuark, MLA
Chair Co-Chair
March 22, 2000
Honourable Levi Barnabas, MLA
Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Nunavut
Mr. Speaker,
Report on the Appointment of the Conflict of Interest Commissioner
of Nunavut
Your Standing Committee of Ajauqtiit has the honour of presenting its
Report on the Appointment of the Conflict of Interest Commissioner of
Nunavut.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the Committee, for consideration
by the Legislative Assembly.
Hunter Tootoo, MLA Ovide Alakannuark, MLA
Chair Co-Chair
Members of the Standing Committee of Ajauqtiit
Hunter Tootoo, MLA Iqaluit Centre, Chair
Ovide Alakannuark, MLA Akulliq, Co-chair
Olayuk Akesuk, MLA South Baffin
David Iqaqrialu, MLA Uqqummiut
Peter Kattuk, MLA Hudson Bay
Alternate Members
Jobie Nutarak, MLA Tunnuniq
Kevin O'Brien, MLA Arviat
Uriash Puqiqnak, MLA Nattilik
Staff Members
Rhoda Perkison, Committee Clerk
Patricia File, Committee Researcher
Standing Committee of Ajauqtiit
Report on the Appointment of the Conflict of Interest Commissioner
of Nunavut
TERMS OF REFERENCE
The mandate of the Standing Committee of Ajauqtiit is to:
- Consider issues related to the Government of Nunavut's obligations
with respect to the implementation of the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement
(NLCA), including the activities of the Government of Nunavut in relation
to the operations of the Boards, Commissions and other bodies established
by the provisions of the NLCA;
- Review the budget of the Office of the Legislative Assembly;
- Recommend the appointment of positions that, by statutory authority,
are made by
the Legislative Assembly; and
- Consider any other matter referred by the House.
Introduction
During the summer and early fall of 1999, Members of the Standing Committee
of Ajauqtiit were involved in the appointments process for three
positions that, by statutory authority, are made by the Legislative Assembly:
- Languages Commissioner of Nunavut
- Information and Privacy Commissioner of Nunavut
- Conflict of Interest Commissioner of Nunavut
During Full Caucus deliberations in June of 1999, it was agreed that
the Standing Committee of Ajauqtiit would bring forward recommendations
for these three positions for consideration by the Legislative Assembly
of Nunavut at the next Session, or as soon as possible thereafter, as
per the terms of reference of the Committee. This report details the process
and the recommendation for the position of Conflict of Interest Commissioner
of Nunavut.
The Conflict of Interest Commissioner has the primary mandate to advise
Members of the Legislative Assembly regarding conflict of interest and
conduct reviews of allegations of conflict of interest by Members of the
Legislative Assembly, as outlined in the Legislative Assembly and Executive
Council Act.
Acknowledgements
The Committee received 26 applications for the position of Conflict of
Interest Commissioner from individuals from across Canada, with a variety
of professional experience. The Committee was pleased with the high
calibre
of the applicants, and would like to thank everyone who expressed an interest
in the position and submitted an application.
The Committee would also like to express its appreciation to the Office
of the Clerk of the Legislative Assembly for the administrative, research
and procedural support it provided. The Committee also thanks Members
for their support in encouraging qualified constituents to apply for the
position.
The Standing Committee also wishes to note that all written materials
reviewed by the Members, including resumes, questions, procedural documents
and drafts of reports were
translated and reviewed by Members in both English and Inuktitut. In addition,
all meetings of the Committee had the assistance of simultaneous interpretation.
We thank the Interpreter/Translator of the Legislative Assembly for her
superior service, and we also acknowledge the dedication and the staff
of Nunavut Tusaavut Inc.
Process
In keeping with the Government of Nunavut's commitment to consultation
and to open and transparent selection processes, the Standing Committee
decided to approach it in a manner similar to that used by the Department
of Human Resources in the hiring of senior public service positions.
In this regard, at the end of August, advertisements in English and Inuktitut,
for the position of Conflict of Interest Commissioner were placed in the
northern newspapers, Nunatsiaq News and News North; and
in the Globe and Mail in English. An application deadline was set
for September 17, 1999. All MLAs also received two letters from the Chair
of the Standing Committee encouraging them to bring the position to the
attention of interested and qualified constituents. Some additional outreach
was also done by the Chair and Assembly staff to encourage people in Nunavut
to apply for the position.
As the Standing Committee was involved in the selection process for three
separate Commissioners, it was agreed that they would use three subcommittees
to conduct the interviews and preliminary selection process for the candidates.
The following Members conducted all of the interviews for the position
of Conflict of Interest Commissioner and made the preliminary recommendation
to the Committee: Hunter Tootoo, Chair; Ovide Alakannuark, Co-chair; and
Olayuk Akesuk, Member.
It was agreed that applicants would be pre-screened for interviews according
to criteria set by the Committee. The prescreening identified 11 applicants
who had northern experience at some point in their careers, 7 of whom
had more experience in administrative law or conflict of interest matters.
Of these candidates, one was a current resident of Nunavut. In addition,
there were two southern candidates who had no northern experience, but
extensive experience in a broad range of financial and conflict of interest
matters. After reviewing these 13 candidates, the Members of the Subcommittee
selected three for face-to-face interviews.
A list of 32 oral questions was developed by the Committee, to be asked
of all candidates in a two-hour interview. In addition, seven written
questions were given to candidates following the interviews and candidates
were given 48 hours to return their written answers to the Committee.
The Committee developed a point system to be used to evaluate the quality
of the answers and other information provided by the candidates. MLAs
on the subcommittee assigned points to each answer and other materials
of the candidates. The candidates were then ranked in their overall results
and the subcommittee discussed the final results of this process.
The Committee tried to select for two strengths - legal expertise, particularly
with respect to conflict of interest provisions; and business expertise,
particularly with respect to advising people on matters such as blind
trusts, etc. The Committee sought advice from Full Caucus as to where
the Members felt the emphasis should be placed. Reference checks were
performed and reviewed by the Members. The recommendation was brought
forward to the whole Standing Committee for discussion and a motion, as
well as a draft report for their review. As the Legislative Assembly was
not in session, the report and recommendation were subsequently brought
to the Management and Services Board for discussion. The Management and
Services Board agreed to appoint an Acting Conflict of Interest Commissioner
under their authority described in Section 79.01.(4) of the Legislative
Assembly and Executive Council Act, with the expectation that the
Full Caucus would review the final selection at the first opportunity
and the appointment would be formally made during the next Session of
the Assembly.
The Standing Committee wishes to emphasize that all of the candidates
interviewed were
very committed and qualified for the position. The decision of the Members
was difficult
and the Members approached it in an unbiased manner and in the spirit
of collegiality. It is the hope of the Members that all candidates will
continue to make contributions to public life in Nunavut.
Committee Meetings Conducted
The Committee and subcommittee met in Iqaluit or by conference call on
the following dates, for the purposes described below:
August 17, 1999
Conference call to discuss process and review draft advertisements.
September 9, 1999
Review of hiring process; Presentation by Human Resources on hiring procedures.
September 14, 1999
Review of draft pre-screening criteria and draft list of oral questions.
September 24, 1999
Review of names of 26 applications received by this date; Selection of
candidates to interview.
September 29, 1999
Review of Interim Report to Full Caucus
October 16, 1999
Interview
October 18, 1999
Interview
October 18, 1999
Interview
October 25/26/27, 1999
Review of answers to written questions, analysis of results of oral interview,
written questions, resume review for all three candidates interviewed.
October 29, 1999
Discussion of presentation to Full Caucus
November 2, 1999
Discussion with Full Caucus regarding priority expertise of Conflict of
Interest Commissioner
November 1999
Discussion of reference check; Discussion of Draft Report to Full Caucus
and to Management and Services Board and Motion
December 14, 1999
Presentation to Management and Services Board
February 2, 2000
Final discussion at Full Caucus
Position of the Conflict of Interest Commissioner
The position of the Conflict of Interest Commissioner and their duties
are laid out in the Legislative Assembly and Executive Council Act.
On March 31, 1999, as per the Nunavut Act, and except as otherwise amended,
all legislation currently in effect in the NWT became the law in effect
for Nunavut on April 1, 1999.
The legislation in the NWT has undergone a number of changes over the
years. For example, the amendments of 1994 made it possible for a member
to seek the advice of the Commissioner and to receive, under s.79.2, a
binding opinion as to the conflicts issues raised by a proposed action
or economic activity. The amendments in 1996 switched to a single Commissioner
system, instead of a five-member panel. Ms. Anne Crawford, a lawyer in
private practice in Iqaluit, was appointed as the Conflict of Interest
Commissioner in February 1997. Other substantive amendments in 1996 moved
from a two-tiered process to a more flexible inquiry by the Commissioner
intended to respond to the variable nature of conflicts complaints. The
1996-97 Annual Report of the Conflict of Interest Commissioner also recommended
further changes to the legislation.
However, the most recent changes to the NWT legislation were made by
the Legislative Assembly of the NWT in the summer of 1999, following an
inquiry in the NWT. These amendments give the Conflict of Interest Commissioner
a greater role in providing preventative advice to Members and it is thereby
hoped that the need for an expensive inquiry in the future will be minimized.
As well, a separate adjudicator would be appointed in the event an inquiry
was needed. As these amendments were made following division, they are
not included in the legislation which was duplicated for Nunavut.
Nevertheless, it will be instructive for the Legislative Assembly of
Nunavut to review them and decide if any would be appropriate for Nunavut.
Prior to division, the Office of the Interim Commissioner established
an Ethics and Accountability Panel to which John Amagoalik and Roger Tasse
were appointed. The Panel assisted candidates in the first Nunavut election
and the elected Members prior to April 1, 1999. Following division, the
Management and Services Board arranged for Robert Clark to be appointed
as the Acting Conflict of Interest commissioner, if a matter arose, until
the Legislative Assembly conducted its own selection process. Mr. Clark
has a full-time position performing the duties of the Conflict of Interest
Commissioner of Alberta.
The Conflict of Interest Commissioner is an independent Officer of the
Legislative Assembly. On the recommendation of the Legislative Assembly,
the Commissioner of Nunavut appoints a person who has been recommended
for the position. The Conflict of Interest Commissioner is accountable
to the Legislative Assembly and must report annually to the Assembly on
the work of the office and any complaints that have been received by the
Commissioner.
The annual report is required by statute to includes a number of categories
of
information, such as:
- Filing of Disclosure Statements by Members
- Late Filing of Disclosure Statements by Name of Member
- Failure to File Disclosure Statements by Name of Member
- Extensions Granted to Members to File their Disclosure Statements
- Contract approvals to any Members who are given authorization to
accept a contract under s. 75.1 (3) of the Act
- Contracts entered into by the Government and a corporation which is
a Member's controlled corporation or a controlled subsidiary.
The Conflict of Interest Commissioner also provides opinions and advice
to Members and comments on the operation of the Act. For example, in the
1997-98 Annual Report, the Conflict of Interest Commissioner of the NWT
issued two general guidelines on "Budget Voting" and on "Question
Period"; three opinions on "Participation in NWTHC Home Ownership
Programs"; "Legal Expense Funds"; and "Ownership of
Shares in Publicly Traded Companies"; and included a discussion paper
on the issue of "Blind and Management Trusts".
The budget for the Conflict of Interest Commissioner has been allocated
to the Legislative Assembly budget based on the experience of the NWT.
It has not been a full-time position, but rather is part-time, on an as-needed
basis. This budget will need further review in Nunavut, once the position
is in place.
Observations
The Conflict of Interest Commissioner plays a key role in ensuring the
successful application of the conflict provisions of the Legislative
Assembly and Executive Council Act, an Act that we inherited from
the NWT.
As noted in the Annual Report for 1997-98 of the Conflict of Interest
Commissioner of
the NWT:
"The Commissioner is in a position to advise and instruct as to
the appropriate arrangements which will meet the Conflicts requirements.
The legislation does not set out the methods or means which the Commissioner
is entitled to use or recommend. The discretion and judgment of the
Commissioner are the primary factors in making these decisions. The
solutions crafted for each Member will reflect the commissioner's understanding
of public concern and acceptance in this jurisdiction, and the likelihood
and extent of risk of conflict."
As noted above, the Commissioner also attached a number of guidelines,
opinions and a discussion paper in the 1997-98 Annual Report. While these
are not binding on the Legislative Assembly of Nunavut, they are nonetheless
instructive of the kinds of issues on which the Conflict of Interest Commissioner
must provide advice to Members and it is vital that the Conflict of Interest
Commissioner of Nunavut has the skills and credibility to do so. These
skills will also be necessary for the Commissioner to assist in the review
of the legislation to ensure it is appropriate for Nunavut.
There are many challenges ahead. The lack of adequate funding for providing
all important services across Nunavut and the competition for government
finances to meet many other important needs in Nunavut means that vigilance
and preventative advice will be needed in ensuring Members live up to
the highest standards of integrity and are not in conflict. We cannot
afford costly legal proceedings. At the same time, Nunavut is a small
jurisdiction, with a relatively small private sector. We want to encourage
Members in private business to run for office, without undue penalty to
their entrepreneurial initiative or family's livelihood. A balance must
be struck. And, as with other legislation inherited from the NWT, we need
to review the whole Act to ensure it is appropriate for and meets the
needs of Nunavummiut.
The Conflict of Interest Commissioner must recognize and be able to meet
these challenges. The Commissioner must be a strong, committed voice for
an open government, which makes unbiased decisions that do not personally
benefit the Members or their families. The commissioner must have diplomacy
and grace to mediate solutions, sensitivity to the needs of government
decision processes, ability to assist different language groups within
Nunavut, and the integrity and administrative competence to deal with
complaints in a fair and timely manner. And although this Commissioner
is resident elsewhere in Canada, as with all public offices in Nunavut,
they must be a leader in the Inuit tradition, able to hold the respect
and confidence of all Inuit, Elders and youth, as well as French- and
English-speaking residents of Nunavut.
The Standing Committee of Ajauqtiit has taken its responsibilities
in this selection process very seriously. The selection process was fair
and thorough, and the Committee is confident that it has selected an outstanding
candidate for the position.
Recommendation
The Standing Committee of Ajauqtiit unanimously recommends to
the Legislative
Assembly that Robert Stanbury be appointed Conflict of Interest Commissioner
of
Nunavut, pursuant to Section 61 of the Legislative Assembly and Executive
Council Act.
Appendix 1 - Candidate's biography
Appendix 2 - Job posting
|